Better ask us where they really put there to see if we learn
is true, students of the UNAM (yet) have (or had) to endure some of the nightmares that plague the sleep and wakefulness of students elsewhere. Things like, for example, university usurious loans in the United States, strung youth and parents to pay, for years, monthly payments of terror.
gringos No wonder they spend importing professionals from other countries.
On the other hand, in our warm and fertile country, any student, "proletarian" that is, he is forced to face polar snow to get to their classes, or to "balance" their meals with three sad vegetables.
And no, gentlemen asambleros squats and I'm not saying we live in clover, or that the dogs here are tied to the proverbial sausage. We could say, with some reason that gives me the experience-is that, here, life has not treated so badly to students.
And there's another consideration: The UNAM is a premier university. OK, we might be in place no-know-how in the world of not-know-who, but I do not have it: the guy who has the ability and the will out of these classrooms prepared in the discipline they wish, to stand alongside the best experts in here, there or yonder.
So where am I going with this? It is very simple: that if we see it, in war, the best soldier is one who knows get the most out of what you have.
(And the sudden appearance of the military language in the text follows a very intentional reason: the "language" that supposedly "better understand" progressive community "college).
In other words, there is no better way to guarantee failure in any "campaign" to waste the resources you have. And I would argue that there is, throughout the world, a country and a university whose resources are very abundant in most stupidly squandered ours.
I'll put the best example I can think of what I say: the dining room and cafeteria vegetarian who keep the "auditorium" Che Guevara of our faculty.
There, the situation is this: for the price of a little nutritious "comida corrida", or a cafesito, the university irresponsible "conscious" is not, of course, compensating UNAM water usage, electricity and other resources illegally monopolized by the "Kolectivo." And that is wasted. It gets worse: every dollar given to those guilty of plunder, is extending material support "life useless" facilities vital to the functioning of our faculty, a school responsible for much of the excellent reputation of the UNAM.
And what comes of this is the obvious, and fucked paradoxical conclusion that there are a number of university students who basically pays a criminal organization to 1) actvidades hinder academic institution, 2) hinder convivecia and 3) waste of public resources. And all under the indifferent gaze of the authorities.
Consider one example: regular, so-called "custodial examinations" that apply in the Biomedical Sciences graduate program, at the time, was heralded as the most advanced academic experiment the-UNAM, show the bad basic training of most students who, for unknown reasons, reach those levels of expertise. And despite the evidence, no authority has arranged to restructure the curriculum and quality control mechanisms in the field of medical sciences, in order to justify the school budget exercise.
In a nutshell, is why this sort of thing in this space, we continue to insist that the university community must acquire sufficient honesty to recognize that this country and this university have many resources, which belong to them has its undeniable advantages . And our biggest problem is that, until now, we are going to panzazo, when it is going, matter of knowing how to manage.
Saturday, April 16, 2011
Sunday, April 3, 2011
Mens Boxer Shorts,days Of The Week
The Civil Protection Plan
Iskra ("Spark") was called a famous revolutionary newspaper founded by Lenin, and explained the title theme: "born spark the flame." The choice of that word in its harshness and brevity, recalls that the flint lighter, I feel very lucky. But that's a poetic question here is irrelevant, I admit. The fact is, I was reminded of this fact by reading the article "Studying recover the Che Guevara auditorium " Millennium appeared in the June 10, 2009, for what, according to the memo, "members of the university community argue: "the eviction could also be the 'spark' to 'ignite' the campus."
Aware that what the press is often called "community college" is, in general, all individuals involved (direct or indirectly) with the UNAM who sympathize with the "left-wing political option" would not be surprised to discover that the spokesman of the "popular sentiment" had agreed, at the time of drawing up a metaphor, his reading of Vladimir Illich.
For a moment, it seems that we are faced with a paradox: since when the left is afraid of the sparks and flames subsequent revolutionary? Yet there is no such contradiction: what happens is that, as we all know, things have changed much in the revolutionary outlook or maybe not, but we'll see "if not all, at least for many Mexican leftists-on particularly for those who have secured their comfortable little place within the "system" (chamba teachers, students enrolled and aspirations for a good union job, etc.) - the "company" has already exceeded the time of the riots and the mess; Now, the revolution must be prosecuted by men calm and reason-as the guiding narrative, by the way "" institutional "? Ahem ... let's leave the "orderly and democratic."
However, perhaps I am, inadvertently falling into an ingenious rhetorical game. Not that I doubt that, if the "Che" becomes the epicenter of an earthquake revolutionary truth, more than half of the "university community" would honking to Europe or the United States. I'm even willing to concede that many campus leftists "detect" a certain indefinable moral and legal inconsistency in the criminal actions of the squatters and therefore his "conviction" is somewhat true, but I think these people when advice "privilegira dialogue" and "negotiate, discuss, convince those who are there," they are most concerned about is saving face.
If you think about it, the question for them is not lost: if someone goes and gets pushed to the thugs, and nothing happens, everything works out well: the left gets rid of a few unpresentable, who were already costing much in terms of public image, and corrected something that they know it is very bad, two birds with one stone. And if the press begins to scream "Suppression, repression, who cares? At the end of the day, they were always "to dialogue" and the mayhem is not your fault.
Moreover, in the very remote event that the revolution garment like wildfire, and do not find a place on the first flight to Paris or New York, they bought their insurance and political survival: a cut in the paper proves that always opposed the institutional violence.
is the best example of what the Americans call a win-win situation, and I think everyone here would love to be in fine shoes of "university community", if not for one small detail: that all is pure hypocrisy.
I mean, take a stand against this type of conflict is like eating a food run: there are vegetable broth or soup pasta: one or the other. In other words, it does not "condemn" the theft of the squat, and then crossed his arms nicely, because this amounts wanting to "negotiate" (!) and "dialogue" to try to "convince" those who, being "there", they are guaranteed housing, food and livelihood. To conclude, the very ones who are "there" have said many times and in the clearest terms that are not going to go anywhere, rain or shine.
So let's not nonsense "convictions" or rectory puts a big blue ribbon and gold auditorium, and gives him the lazy facilities that they have been appropriate, against reason and law, not "burn" or sends for the police, and bought a few asbestos-covered clothes just in case. What
the issue is "sensitive", you say, Don José? That there is no way to operate without compromising the race? Man, clearly that's all true! But hear me, do you believe that the rector chamba just about cutting ribbons? In that case, I apologize, you are not a hypocrite. Whatever it is, they say a word I prefer not to use at this time.
Iskra ("Spark") was called a famous revolutionary newspaper founded by Lenin, and explained the title theme: "born spark the flame." The choice of that word in its harshness and brevity, recalls that the flint lighter, I feel very lucky. But that's a poetic question here is irrelevant, I admit. The fact is, I was reminded of this fact by reading the article "Studying recover the Che Guevara auditorium " Millennium appeared in the June 10, 2009, for what, according to the memo, "members of the university community argue: "the eviction could also be the 'spark' to 'ignite' the campus."
Aware that what the press is often called "community college" is, in general, all individuals involved (direct or indirectly) with the UNAM who sympathize with the "left-wing political option" would not be surprised to discover that the spokesman of the "popular sentiment" had agreed, at the time of drawing up a metaphor, his reading of Vladimir Illich.
For a moment, it seems that we are faced with a paradox: since when the left is afraid of the sparks and flames subsequent revolutionary? Yet there is no such contradiction: what happens is that, as we all know, things have changed much in the revolutionary outlook or maybe not, but we'll see "if not all, at least for many Mexican leftists-on particularly for those who have secured their comfortable little place within the "system" (chamba teachers, students enrolled and aspirations for a good union job, etc.) - the "company" has already exceeded the time of the riots and the mess; Now, the revolution must be prosecuted by men calm and reason-as the guiding narrative, by the way "" institutional "? Ahem ... let's leave the "orderly and democratic."
However, perhaps I am, inadvertently falling into an ingenious rhetorical game. Not that I doubt that, if the "Che" becomes the epicenter of an earthquake revolutionary truth, more than half of the "university community" would honking to Europe or the United States. I'm even willing to concede that many campus leftists "detect" a certain indefinable moral and legal inconsistency in the criminal actions of the squatters and therefore his "conviction" is somewhat true, but I think these people when advice "privilegira dialogue" and "negotiate, discuss, convince those who are there," they are most concerned about is saving face.
If you think about it, the question for them is not lost: if someone goes and gets pushed to the thugs, and nothing happens, everything works out well: the left gets rid of a few unpresentable, who were already costing much in terms of public image, and corrected something that they know it is very bad, two birds with one stone. And if the press begins to scream "Suppression, repression, who cares? At the end of the day, they were always "to dialogue" and the mayhem is not your fault.
Moreover, in the very remote event that the revolution garment like wildfire, and do not find a place on the first flight to Paris or New York, they bought their insurance and political survival: a cut in the paper proves that always opposed the institutional violence.
is the best example of what the Americans call a win-win situation, and I think everyone here would love to be in fine shoes of "university community", if not for one small detail: that all is pure hypocrisy.
I mean, take a stand against this type of conflict is like eating a food run: there are vegetable broth or soup pasta: one or the other. In other words, it does not "condemn" the theft of the squat, and then crossed his arms nicely, because this amounts wanting to "negotiate" (!) and "dialogue" to try to "convince" those who, being "there", they are guaranteed housing, food and livelihood. To conclude, the very ones who are "there" have said many times and in the clearest terms that are not going to go anywhere, rain or shine.
So let's not nonsense "convictions" or rectory puts a big blue ribbon and gold auditorium, and gives him the lazy facilities that they have been appropriate, against reason and law, not "burn" or sends for the police, and bought a few asbestos-covered clothes just in case. What
the issue is "sensitive", you say, Don José? That there is no way to operate without compromising the race? Man, clearly that's all true! But hear me, do you believe that the rector chamba just about cutting ribbons? In that case, I apologize, you are not a hypocrite. Whatever it is, they say a word I prefer not to use at this time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)