The Civil Protection Plan Iskra ("Spark") was called a famous revolutionary newspaper founded by Lenin, and explained the title theme: "born spark the flame." The choice of that word in its harshness and brevity, recalls that the flint lighter, I feel very lucky. But that's a poetic question here is irrelevant, I admit. The fact is, I was reminded of this fact by reading the article "Studying
recover the Che Guevara auditorium " Millennium appeared in the June 10, 2009, for what, according to the memo, "members of the university community argue: "the eviction could also be the 'spark' to 'ignite' the campus."
Aware that what the press is often called "community college" is, in general, all individuals involved (direct or indirectly) with the UNAM who sympathize with the "left-wing political option" would not be surprised to discover that the spokesman of the "popular sentiment" had agreed, at the time of drawing up a metaphor, his reading of Vladimir Illich.
For a moment, it seems that we are faced with a paradox: since when the left is afraid of the sparks and flames subsequent revolutionary? Yet there is no such contradiction: what happens is that, as we all know, things have changed much in the revolutionary outlook or maybe not, but we'll see "if not all, at least for many Mexican leftists-on particularly for those who have secured their comfortable little place within the "system" (chamba teachers, students enrolled and aspirations for a good union job, etc.) - the "company" has already exceeded the time of the riots and the mess; Now, the revolution must be prosecuted by men calm and reason-as the guiding narrative, by the way "" institutional "? Ahem ... let's leave the "orderly and democratic."
However, perhaps I am, inadvertently falling into an ingenious rhetorical game. Not that I doubt that, if the "Che" becomes the epicenter of an earthquake revolutionary truth, more than half of the "university community" would honking to Europe or the United States. I'm even willing to concede that many campus leftists "detect" a certain indefinable moral and legal inconsistency in the criminal actions of the squatters and therefore his "conviction" is somewhat true, but I think these people when advice "privilegira dialogue" and "negotiate, discuss, convince those who are there," they are most concerned about is saving face.
If you think about it, the question for them is not lost: if someone goes and gets pushed to the thugs, and nothing happens, everything works out well: the left gets rid of a few unpresentable, who were already costing much in terms of public image, and corrected something that they know it is very bad, two birds with one stone. And if the press begins to scream "Suppression, repression, who cares? At the end of the day, they were always "to dialogue" and the mayhem is not your fault.
Moreover, in the very remote event that the revolution garment like wildfire, and do not find a place on the first flight to Paris or New York, they bought their insurance and political survival: a cut in the paper proves that always opposed the institutional violence.
is the best example of what the Americans call a win-win
situation, and I think everyone here would love to be in fine shoes of "university community", if not for one small detail: that all is pure hypocrisy.
I mean, take a stand against this type of conflict is like eating a food run: there are vegetable broth or soup pasta: one or the other. In other words, it does not "condemn" the theft of the squat, and then crossed his arms nicely, because this amounts wanting to "negotiate" (!) and "dialogue" to try to "convince" those who, being "there", they are guaranteed housing, food and livelihood. To conclude, the very ones who are "there" have said many times and in the clearest terms that are not going to go anywhere, rain or shine.
So let's not nonsense "convictions" or rectory puts a big blue ribbon and gold auditorium, and gives him the lazy facilities that they have been appropriate, against reason and law, not "burn" or sends for the police, and bought a few asbestos-covered clothes just in case. What
the issue is "sensitive", you say, Don José? That there is no way to operate without compromising the race? Man, clearly that's all true! But hear me, do you believe that the rector chamba just about cutting ribbons? In that case, I apologize, you are not a hypocrite. Whatever it is, they say a word I prefer not to use at this time.
Australia .- Alan John Miller and Mary Suzanne Luck be an Australian couple more if not for the statements made on its website, which claim to be the reincarnation of Jesus and Mary Magdalene, respectively . Your web space by the name of Divine Truth and announces the second coming of the couple who, interestingly, coincides with these days when we only hear about the impending apocalypse. Miller has 47 years, and Luck 32 but it seems that man is the leading voice of this couple even organized seminars to discuss their 'truth'. Jesus (Miller) states that "did not want to be Jesus. Who wants to be Jesus? "but" love "divine truth and can not do anything but follow his destiny. In terms of lifestyle, besides preaching are making a good case, since only in one year managed to raise $ 400,000 for construct a building of international visitors. But, if Jesus has been absent for over 1900 years with Mary Magdalene, where he was when he prayed? noted that "many began to commit mistakes from the third century" within of the Church, Miller, Jesus explains on its website that was with Suzanne and Mary enjoying the contact with God and living in a spiritual space agencies of various kinds. Now he's back to tell the truth but what is the world willing to listen to the umpteenth reincarnation who claims to be a divine character essential to thousands of gullible? We'll see. Source: Noticiasdecristianos. 
