of this site is said and his colleagues are "pro-enforcement."
The following lines set out the reasons why I'm actually pro-authorities.
First we must clarify a very common mistake today: the use of the term "authority" as a synonym for "official." We will see below that these terms are different from each other, but not contradictory as some suggest.
Authority call credit standing and recognizing a person or institution for their legitimacy or their quality and competence in a subject; an officer is simply a person who plays public employment.
is important to note that the authority is not imposed, is conferred on a voluntary basis by one who recognizes teachers in another, and it is an extraordinary phenomenon in the universe happen every day when students give respect and confidence in their teachers to instruct them, inevitably has happened in all the seats of culture and is an essential part of every community to seek some kind of common good.
concepts are identified, but they are not exclusive. It is not impossible that an official is a person on which confers authority, or vice versa, that a person with authority in a community can become official.
The reason why the officer usually write the epithet of "authority" is not necessarily a desire to tax and fascist. Although the nature of "authority" is contingent on the position of official responsibility is not contingent on which the official is the custodian: An official is responsible for responsible exercise involved. We can say it is by virtue of the alleged exercise of such responsibility that is bestowed the epithet of the official authority, and when it happens then has a dual commitment to honor.
course, the possibility exists that the staff creates the misleading and think that the charge has been granted authority for free, and much worse, has been given some kind of power.
This possibility can only be observed with the contrast between responsibilities and exercise of these responsibilities: You can not judge an officer without leave hold office, nor held liable for failure to comply with responsibilities that do not belong.
When looking for who holds the positions with increased responsibilities at the university, names often arise on which is of some authority, that if exercised responsibly or are responsible authorities is one of the responsibilities of the community, but shall do so with the same responsibility as the officer is expected, with relevant arguments and a reasonable university spirit.
In that sense, yes, I am pro authorities.
I think our university and our country need urgent authorities.
The following lines set out the reasons why I'm actually pro-authorities.
First we must clarify a very common mistake today: the use of the term "authority" as a synonym for "official." We will see below that these terms are different from each other, but not contradictory as some suggest.
Authority call credit standing and recognizing a person or institution for their legitimacy or their quality and competence in a subject; an officer is simply a person who plays public employment.
is important to note that the authority is not imposed, is conferred on a voluntary basis by one who recognizes teachers in another, and it is an extraordinary phenomenon in the universe happen every day when students give respect and confidence in their teachers to instruct them, inevitably has happened in all the seats of culture and is an essential part of every community to seek some kind of common good.
concepts are identified, but they are not exclusive. It is not impossible that an official is a person on which confers authority, or vice versa, that a person with authority in a community can become official.
The reason why the officer usually write the epithet of "authority" is not necessarily a desire to tax and fascist. Although the nature of "authority" is contingent on the position of official responsibility is not contingent on which the official is the custodian: An official is responsible for responsible exercise involved. We can say it is by virtue of the alleged exercise of such responsibility that is bestowed the epithet of the official authority, and when it happens then has a dual commitment to honor.
course, the possibility exists that the staff creates the misleading and think that the charge has been granted authority for free, and much worse, has been given some kind of power.
This possibility can only be observed with the contrast between responsibilities and exercise of these responsibilities: You can not judge an officer without leave hold office, nor held liable for failure to comply with responsibilities that do not belong.
When looking for who holds the positions with increased responsibilities at the university, names often arise on which is of some authority, that if exercised responsibly or are responsible authorities is one of the responsibilities of the community, but shall do so with the same responsibility as the officer is expected, with relevant arguments and a reasonable university spirit.
In that sense, yes, I am pro authorities.
I think our university and our country need urgent authorities.
0 comments:
Post a Comment